Mineral thermodynamic databases and elastic inference
Research context
research method · conditional · As of 2026-10-10
Combining mineral phase fractions with elastic properties can predict seismic velocities, but equilibrium databases and shear-modulus data have separate calibration domains.
Key knowledge
Combining mineral phase fractions with elastic properties can predict seismic velocities, but equilibrium databases and shear-modulus data have separate calibration domains. Mixing Gibbs-energy reference conventions without conversion corrupts thermodynamic comparisons.
Conditions and scope
- Specify aggregate averaging, temperature/pressure and composition support; isotropic elasticity does not reproduce anisotropic waves.
- Do not treat an EOS fitted for phase equilibria as an independently validated shear model.
Sources · 2
References
Sources retain their recorded scope. A source link alone does not establish verification of every statement.
Evidence and review
Perple_X thermodynamic data: Gibbs-energy reference conventions and EOS derivatives (selected source body inspected). Perple_X seismic velocity calculations: Bulk/shear moduli, elastic-wave calculation and database limitations (selected source body inspected).
2026-10-10 · Bounded source check of the recorded statement and conditions. This does not certify a unique physical model, reproduce the cited study or replace independent branch review.
Entry details
Permanent link to this entry ↗- Record identity
- research-earth-mineral-elasticity
- Revision
- research.1
- Structured reference record
- Postgraduate & research reference