GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ARK

Agriculture & Future Food Systems · Article

Infiltration, Storage and Evapotranspiration

Follow water from rain and irrigation into a defined root zone, through storage, drainage and plant water use.

Preparation and related reading

Shared Foundations

Related articles

This article helps you

  • Distinguish surface entry, redistribution, storage and root access.
  • Explain evaporation and transpiration without treating reference ET as actual crop demand.
  • Balance water over one named area, depth and interval.
  • Convert water depth into volume and recognise measurement limits.

A rain event has several destinations

After rain, one patch stays wet while another dries quickly. A rain gauge describes water arriving above a surface; it does not tell us how much enters the soil, remains near roots or becomes available to a crop. Following the water explains the difference.

Choose an area, a soil depth and a time interval before making an account. Here the root zone is a fixed layer occupied by active roots. Water can enter through its upper surface, move upward from deeper soil or move sideways. It can leave through plant uptake, evaporation, downward drainage or lateral flow. Changing the chosen depth changes what counts as stored water.

Infiltration is entry, not permanent storage

Infiltration means water crossing the soil surface. The rate is often expressed as millimetres of water depth per hour. It varies with surface condition, existing wetness, pore connections and soil structure. Texture matters, but a texture name alone cannot predict a field rate. Crusting or compaction can restrict entry; connected pores can provide faster routes.

Water supplied faster than it enters may pond or run off. Water that infiltrates can still move below the selected roots. This deeper movement is percolation; crossing the lower root-zone boundary is drainage in this account. A wet surface therefore neither proves uniform wetting at depth nor guarantees that the whole application remains accessible to roots.

Stored water and accessible water differ

Soil retains water within pores and on surfaces. As soil dries, some remaining water is held too strongly, or moves too slowly toward roots, to meet plant demand. Roots also differ in depth, distribution and activity. Two layers containing equal water amounts can therefore provide different opportunities for uptake.

Field capacity describes a reference water content after relatively rapid drainage has slowed. It is not a universal waiting time or an exact boundary between healthy and unhealthy soil. Likewise, permanent wilting point is a reference used in estimating plant-available water, not a statement that all soil water has disappeared. Rooting depth, salinity and aeration help determine how these concepts apply.

Evapotranspiration joins two processes

Evaporation transfers liquid water from exposed wet surfaces into the air. Transpiration transfers water through a living plant and out mainly through leaf stomata. Their combined amount is evapotranspiration, abbreviated ET. Sunlight, air conditions, wind, canopy development and water supply influence it. ET is a water flux, not an amount of crop growth.

A weather-based reference ET describes a defined reference surface. Actual crop ET also depends on crop development and growing conditions. A stressed or waterlogged crop may use less water because growth or uptake is restricted; low ET does not automatically show efficient production. A water balance also needs to distinguish rain intercepted and evaporated above the soil from rain actually reaching the soil surface.

Keep inputs, outputs and storage together

For a simplified fixed root zone, write final storage = initial storage + rain + irrigation − runoff − ET − drainage. Here rain and irrigation are amounts reaching the chosen soil surface. Assume no capillary rise, lateral flow or material change in plant water storage. All entries refer to the same area and interval; runoff is subtracted before counting infiltrated water.

In an illustrative interval, initial soil-water storage is 40 mm. Rain adds 18 mm and irrigation 12 mm. Runoff removes 4 mm, ET 16 mm and drainage 4 mm. Thus 40 + 18 + 12 − 4 − 16 − 4 = 46 mm remains. The storage gain is 6 mm, not 30 mm. These supplied values demonstrate accounting; they are not a recommended moisture content or irrigation schedule.

Hypothetical fixed root-zone account, one area and interval
EntryWater depth (mm)Account role
Initial storage40Starting stock
Rain + irrigation18 + 12 = 30Surface supply
Runoff4Does not infiltrate
ET16Leaves as vapour
Drainage4Crosses lower boundary
Final storage4640 + 30 − 4 − 16 − 4

The same water account in a flow diagram

The same water account in a flow diagramFollow the hypothetical 30 mm surface supply and the initial 40 mm soil stock to the final 46 mm root-zone stock. Arrows name accounted amounts, not rates or proportional widths. This example omits canopy interception, lateral flow, capillary rise and material plant-water storage change.Rain 18 + irrigation 12mmSurface supply totals 30 mm duringthe chosen interval.Surface supply 30 mm26 mm infiltrates;4 mm leaves asrunoff.Runoff 4 mmThis water is not added toroot-zone storage.Initial storage 40 mmFixed root depth; no lateral flowor capillary rise.Final storage 46 mm40 + 26 − 16 − 4 = 46 mm.ET 16 mmSoil evaporation and planttranspiration.Drainage 4 mmWater crosses the lower root-zoneboundary.30 mmsupplied4 mm runoff26 mm infiltrates40 mm start16 mm to air4 mm below roots
Arrows name accounted amounts, not rates or proportional widths. This example omits canopy interception, lateral flow, capillary rise and material plant-water storage change.
Read the diagram as text

Follow the hypothetical 30 mm surface supply and the initial 40 mm soil stock to the final 46 mm root-zone stock.

Parts

Rain 18 + irrigation 12 mm
Surface supply totals 30 mm during the chosen interval.
Surface supply 30 mm
26 mm infiltrates;4 mm leaves as runoff.
Runoff 4 mm
This water is not added to root-zone storage.
Initial storage 40 mm
Fixed root depth; no lateral flow or capillary rise.
Final storage 46 mm
40 + 26 − 16 − 4 = 46 mm.
ET 16 mm
Soil evaporation and plant transpiration.
Drainage 4 mm
Water crosses the lower root-zone boundary.

Connections

  • Rain 18 + irrigation 12 mm → Surface supply 30 mm: 30 mm supplied
  • Surface supply 30 mm → Runoff 4 mm: 4 mm runoff
  • Surface supply 30 mm → Final storage 46 mm: 26 mm infiltrates
  • Initial storage 40 mm → Final storage 46 mm: 40 mm start
  • Final storage 46 mm → ET 16 mm: 16 mm to air
  • Final storage 46 mm → Drainage 4 mm: 4 mm below roots

Depth needs an area and a measurement method

A water depth represents volume spread over a named area. One millimetre over one square metre is one litre; one millimetre over one hectare is ten cubic metres. A depth per day is a rate, while a depth accumulated during a week is an amount. Keep those units separate when comparing a rainfall event with daily ET.

Measurements should cover the relevant soil layers and variable patches, with sensor calibration and timing recorded. Unmeasured drainage or capillary supply can make an apparent balance residual misleading. A closed numerical account is useful, but matching totals alone does not prove that every measured term is correct. Use it to identify missing flows and improve observations.

Worked examples

A six-millimetre storage gain

What remains in the example root zone?

  1. Start with 40 mm of stored water.
  2. Surface supply is 18 + 12 = 30 mm;4 mm runs off, leaving 26 mm to infiltrate.
  3. Outputs from soil and plants are 16 + 4 = 20 mm under the stated assumptions.
  4. Final storage is 40 + 26 − 20 = 46 mm.

Storage increases by 6 mm; neither the rain gauge nor the supply total alone gives that change.

An eight-millimetre application

What volume does 8 mm represent over 250 m²?

  1. Convert 8 mm to 0.008 m.
  2. Multiply 0.008 m × 250 m²= 2 m³.
  3. Convert 2 m³ to 2000 L.

The volume is 2 m³, assuming 8 mm is the mean depth across the full 250 m²; this says nothing about uniformity or retained root-zone water.

Check your understanding

  1. Does all water that infiltrates stay within the selected root zone?

    Show answer and reasoning

    No.

    Some can cross the lower boundary by drainage or move laterally; infiltration describes entry rather than its final destination.

  2. A dry layer still contains water. Does that prove uptake can meet crop demand?

    Show answer and reasoning

    No.

    Retention, movement toward roots, rooting and salinity affect access to the remaining water.

  3. Can a low observed ET alone establish good water productivity?

    Show answer and reasoning

    No.

    It may reflect restricted growth or water uptake. Compare a defined useful output with a defined water denominator.

Key ideas

  • Name the root-zone boundary, area and interval before adding water flows.
  • Infiltration, stored water and accessible water answer different questions.
  • ET combines evaporation and transpiration; actual crop conditions matter.
  • Account for runoff, drainage and storage change instead of assigning all supply to the crop.

References

Sources supporting the explanations and examples in this article.

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)2 sources
    1. Crop evapotranspiration — Chapter 1: Introduction to evapotranspirationRichard G. Allen, Luis S. Pereira, Dirk Raes, Martin SmithTeaching resourcefao.orgRead source
    2. Crop evapotranspiration — Chapter 8: Soil water stressRichard G. Allen, Luis S. Pereira, Dirk Raes, Martin SmithTeaching resourcefao.orgRead source
  2. Introduction to Irrigation — Chapter 2: Soil and waterC. Brouwer, A. Goffeau, M. HeibloemTeaching resourcefao.orgRead source