Cosmology · Baryons, gas and cosmic neutrinos
Neutrino mass and free streaming
Compare two mono-momentum collisionless test populations in an imposed expanding background, tracking their speeds, finite travel and angular phase mixing.
Preparation: ratios, powers of ten and ordinary arithmetic. Physical quantities and notation are introduced as they are needed.
Back to the chapterAfter reading, you can
- Relate a massive particle’s redshifting momentum to its local speed.
- Calculate the meaning and units of a finite comoving travel integral.
- Distinguish transport-induced phase mixing from particle loss and a full thermal-neutrino transfer prediction.
A massive relic slows as momentum redshifts
A decoupled massive particle can retain a redshifting momentum distribution while its speed changes. The local relation E² = p²c² + m²c⁴ gives v/c = pc/E.
For a fixed particle mass, decreasing momentum eventually makes the speed substantially smaller than c. A relic population contains a distribution of momenta, so different particles need not make that transition together.
Transport can change a density perturbation because particles arriving from different directions carry different spatial phases. Real neutrino structure calculations also include gravitational metric forcing and the momentum distribution.
Isolate the transport mechanism with two prescribed mono-momentum test populations. Their small density and absent perturbative metric forcing leave the background imposed by other matter; this is a conditional model rather than a thermal-neutrino fit.
Use the same expansion and reference momentum
Normalize a_ref = 1 and write a = q over 1 ≤ q ≤ 8. Supply H(q) = H_*q⁻³ᐟ², with arbitrary positive H_* in inverse proper seconds, representing a matter-only background.
Both independent populations have the same positive comoving momentum scale p_ref. Physical momentum is p = p_ref/q. Directions are isotropic and remain fixed along the unforced test trajectories.
Define η = mc/p_ref and choose η = 0.5 or 2. Their speeds obey v/c = 1/√[1+(ηq)²]. The larger η is slower at every displayed q.
These η values are dimensionless choices, not actual neutrino masses or eigenstate measurements. Neither a thermal distribution nor interaction history is supplied by assigning one reference momentum.
Travel depends on the whole supplied interval
Let χ be comoving distance accumulated from q = 1. With dt/dq = 1/(qH) and dχ/dt = v/a, its derivative is dχ/dq = v/(q²H).
Define X = H_*χ/c. Substitution gives X(q) = ∫₁ᑫdu/[√u√(1+(ηu)²)]. All displayed X values are dimensionless, while χ has comoving length units c/H_*.
At q = 8, the η = 0.5 population has X ≈ 1.883955 and the η = 2 population X ≈ 0.623866. The latter’s smaller speed makes its positive travel integrand smaller throughout the interval.
A light signal over the same imposed interval would have X_light = 2(√q−1), about 3.656854 at q = 8. The particle paths stay below that bound. None of these finite integrals is a particle horizon from the complete cosmic past or an instantaneous v/H scale.
| q | v/c, η = 0.5 | v/c, η = 2 | X, η = 0.5 | X, η = 2 | Mode ratio, η = 0.5 | Mode ratio, η = 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.894427 | 0.447214 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 0.707107 | 0.242536 | 0.667494 | 0.274483 | 0.927379 | 0.987490 |
| 4 | 0.447214 | 0.124035 | 1.334988 | 0.478058 | 0.728341 | 0.962343 |
| 8 | 0.242536 | 0.0623783 | 1.883955 | 0.623866 | 0.504983 | 0.936383 |
Transport changes a contrast mode without removing particles
Supply a weak initial spatial density mode with amplitude δ_initial = 0.01 and the same isotropic directional distribution. Let its comoving wavenumber be k and choose κ = kc/H_* = 1.
Averaging unforced trajectories over direction gives δ(q)/δ_initial = j₀(kχ) = sin(κX)/(κX), with value one at X = 0. The coefficient is an angular phase average.
At q = 8 the coefficients are approximately 0.504983 and 0.936383 for the two η choices. The larger travel has mixed more of this supplied mode’s phase, while the heavier test population retains more of its initial contrast.
Comoving particle inventory is conserved and the proper mean number density dilutes as q⁻³. A reduced contrast coefficient does not mean particles were destroyed. The displayed phases remain below π; no globally monotonic suppression rule is inferred outside this finite range.
A real prediction needs the coupled perturbation system
A thermal relic has a range of momenta and species properties. Its contribution to structure also depends on how its density and velocity perturbations interact gravitationally with other components.
The test populations omit that distribution and perturbative forcing. Their finite travel and sinc factors therefore do not supply an observed cutoff, a Jeans criterion, a real matter transfer function or a neutrino mass bound.
Different free-streaming length conventions can use instantaneous rates or integrated travel under stated conditions. Their definitions should be compared before their numerical values are treated as the same scale.
The useful mechanism is that mass and redshifting momentum control transport, and transport affects spatial contrast through phase mixing. The next lesson asks what homogeneous population moments can and cannot identify when mass and momentum scale are allowed to vary together.
Worked reasoning
Order the accumulated paths
At the same reference momentum and background, why does η = 2 travel less than η = 0.5 for every q > 1 in the displayed interval?
- For each u, the factor √(1+(ηu)²) is larger for η = 2.
- Its positive comoving-travel integrand is therefore smaller at every u from 1 to q.
- Integrating over the same interval gives a smaller X, including 0.623866 versus 1.883955 at q = 8.
The mass-dependent speed orders the entire positive travel integral under the supplied common background.
Try the reasoning
Is X the instantaneous quantity v/H or a particle horizon from the beginning of cosmic history?
Show the answer and reasoning
Neither.
It is the normalized comoving path integrated only from the supplied q = 1 boundary.
Does a falling density-mode coefficient indicate that particles have been removed?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
Directional phase averaging changes the contrast while the comoving particle count stays fixed.
Can the two mono-momentum curves directly provide a real thermal-neutrino mass constraint?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
A thermal distribution, gravitational perturbations, data and a conditional inference model remain required.
What to carry forward
- Mass and redshifting momentum jointly determine a collisionless particle’s speed.
- Finite comoving transport is an integral over a specified interval, distinct from instantaneous scale conventions.
- Angular phase mixing affects density contrast; full relic-neutrino inference needs the momentum distribution, gravity and observations.
References
Sources supporting the explanations, physical distinctions and examples in this lesson.