GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ARK

Cosmology · Dark-matter candidates and discriminating tests

Laboratory and astronomical searches

Calculate a simple nuclear-recoil threshold response, then distinguish it from field, collider and astronomical search mechanisms.

Preparation: ratios, powers of ten and ordinary arithmetic. Physical quantities and notation are introduced as they are needed.

Back to the chapter

After reading, you can

  • Connect a proposed interaction to an instrument’s actual response.
  • Calculate recoil endpoints, acceptance and a conditional event rate.
  • Explain why different searches require different background and identity tests.
01

Specify the response before interpreting a result

A dark-matter search tests a proposed physical response. A nuclear recoil, conversion of a field, missing collider momentum and a gravitational lensing event are different observations with different connections to a candidate model.

For each search, specify the population, interaction or gravitational effect, instrument selection and competing sources. A feature in an instrument becomes evidence for a candidate only through this chain of prediction and comparison.

A recoil experiment, for example, needs the local population and velocity distribution as well as scattering physics. A missing-momentum collider event also requires an event model and does not alone establish a cosmological abundance or lifetime.

The following supplied recoil calculation isolates kinematics and an energy threshold. It contains no measured events, fitted background, detector data or empirical cross-section limit.

02

Mass matching sets an energy endpoint

Take nonrelativistic incident particles of one speed v ≪ c and mass m_χ striking stationary target nuclei of mass m_T. Write r = m_χ/m_T and μ = m_χm_T/(m_χ+m_T) = m_Tr/(1+r) for the reduced mass.

For elastic scattering, the largest possible nuclear recoil energy is E_max = 2μ²v²/m_T. It occurs in a head-on reversal of the relative motion. In units m_Tv², E_max is 2r²/(1+r)².

Relative to the incident kinetic energy m_χv²/2, the maximum transferred fraction is 4r/(1+r)². It reaches one at equal masses and falls for large mismatch in either direction.

Supply an isotropic center-of-mass angular distribution and a common total cross section σ₀ for all three comparison masses. With no form factor, these choices give a uniform recoil-energy density on [0,E_max]. Other scattering laws need not have that density.

Exact supplied mono-speed elastic kinematics and threshold response
r = m_χ/m_Tμ/m_TE_max/(m_Tv²)Maximum incident-energy fractionAccepted fractionR/C
1/41/50.080.6400
11/20.511/21/2
44/51.280.64103/128103/512
03

Flux and acceptance both enter a count rate

Choose a recoil threshold E_th = m_Tv²/4. With the uniform recoil density, the accepted fraction is A = max(0,1−E_th/E_max). Thus the first row gives no accepted recoils despite having a nonzero total cross section.

Hold the incident mass density ρ_χ and the target count N_T fixed. The incident number density is ρ_χ/m_χ, so its flux is (ρ_χ/m_χ)v.

The accepted event rate in this ideal reference is R = N_T(ρ_χ/m_χ)vσ₀A. Define C = N_T(ρ_χ/m_T)vσ₀, which has units of inverse time. Then R/C = A/r.

At r = 4, A = 103/128 ≈ 0.804688, but R/C = 103/512 ≈ 0.201172. Better acceptance does not by itself imply a larger count rate: increasing individual mass at fixed mass density lowers the number flux.

Recoil energy thresholds, acceptance and fixed-density number fluxThis original nonrelativistic mono-speed elastic-scattering example uses incident mass m_χ, stationary target-nucleus mass m_T, chosen mass ratios r = m_χ/m_T equal to 1/4, 1, 4, common speed v much smaller than c, common total cross section σ₀, incident mass density ρ_χ and target count N_T. There are no observations, form factors, velocity dispersion, backgrounds or instrument uncertainties. Reduced mass μ = m_Tr/(1+r) gives maximum recoil E_max = 2μ²v²/m_T. Panel A shows horizontal zero-based endpoint bars on a linear energy axis E_max/(m_Tv²) from 0 to 1.5. Rows r = 1/4, 1, 4 have endpoints 0.08, 0.5, 1.28. A dashed green line at 0.25 is the separately supplied threshold E_th/(m_Tv²) = 1/4, explicitly identified in text. The first bar ends below threshold. Isotropy in the center-of-mass frame makes the recoil energy uniform on [0, E_max] for the stipulated constant cross section. Panel B compares accepted fraction A = max(0, 1−E_th/E_max) with normalized accepted rate R/C on a separate dimensionless zero-based ordinate from 0 to 1. Three equally spaced discrete mass-ratio slots are categorical, not a continuous or linear mass axis. Blue circles mark A = 0, 1/2, 103/128; orange squares mark R/C = 0, 1/2, 103/512. At the first two choices the marker pairs coincide exactly and are labelled both 0 and both 1/2. At r = 4 they separate: A = 103/128 = 0.8046875, whereas R/C = 103/512 = 0.201171875. Shapes, direct fractions and legends distinguish quantities without color. The rate also uses the incident number flux: R = N_T(ρ_χ/m_χ)vσ₀A and C = N_T(ρ_χ/m_T)vσ₀. C is in s⁻¹ and R/C = A/r. Increasing individual mass at fixed mass density reduces number flux, so greater acceptance alone need not yield a greater count rate. Maximum incident kinetic-energy fractions are 4r/(1+r)² = 0.64, 1, 0.64, with equality at mass matching; these are separate from the accepted fractions. Energy units m_Tv² are joules, cross section m², density kg m⁻³ and number counts dimensionless. This conditional nuclear-recoil response does not describe field conversion, collider missing momentum or gravitational lensing. It supplies no actual detector sensitivity, empirical mass ranking, cross-section exclusion, candidate abundance or discovery. Other searches need their own population, interaction, geometry, selection and background predictions.Threshold acceptance and flux are differentSupplied mono-speed v ≪ c; stationary targets; isotropic CM.Common mass density ρ_χ, target count N_T and total σ₀.No form factor, backgrounds or real detector response.A · Recoil endpoints in units m_Tv²Dashed green threshold: E_th/(m_Tv²) = 1/4r = 1/40.08r = 10.5r = 41.2800.250.511.5Maximum recoil E_max/(m_Tv²) · linear zero baselineB · Separate dimensionless acceptance and rate ratiosAccepted fraction ARate R/C = A/r00.250.50.751r = 1/4both 0r = 1both 1/2r = 4A = 103/128R/C = 103/512Three discrete mass ratios · categorical spacingE_max = 2μ²v²/m_T; μ = m_Tr/(1+r).Uniform recoil energies: A = max(0, 1−E_th/E_max).C = N_T(ρ_χ/m_T)vσ₀ has units s⁻¹; R/C = A/r.At r = 4: A ≈ 0.804688, while R/C ≈ 0.201172.A larger acceptance can coexist with a lower number flux.No measured sensitivity, candidate ranking or discovery is inferred.
This original nonrelativistic mono-speed elastic-scattering example uses incident mass m_χ, stationary target-nucleus mass m_T, chosen mass ratios r = m_χ/m_T equal to 1/4, 1, 4, common speed v much smaller than c, common total cross section σ₀, incident mass density ρ_χ and target count N_T. There are no observations, form factors, velocity dispersion, backgrounds or instrument uncertainties. Reduced mass μ = m_Tr/(1+r) gives maximum recoil E_max = 2μ²v²/m_T. Panel A shows horizontal zero-based endpoint bars on a linear energy axis E_max/(m_Tv²) from 0 to 1.5. Rows r = 1/4, 1, 4 have endpoints 0.08, 0.5, 1.28. A dashed green line at 0.25 is the separately supplied threshold E_th/(m_Tv²) = 1/4, explicitly identified in text. The first bar ends below threshold. Isotropy in the center-of-mass frame makes the recoil energy uniform on [0, E_max] for the stipulated constant cross section. Panel B compares accepted fraction A = max(0, 1−E_th/E_max) with normalized accepted rate R/C on a separate dimensionless zero-based ordinate from 0 to 1. Three equally spaced discrete mass-ratio slots are categorical, not a continuous or linear mass axis. Blue circles mark A = 0, 1/2, 103/128; orange squares mark R/C = 0, 1/2, 103/512. At the first two choices the marker pairs coincide exactly and are labelled both 0 and both 1/2. At r = 4 they separate: A = 103/128 = 0.8046875, whereas R/C = 103/512 = 0.201171875. Shapes, direct fractions and legends distinguish quantities without color. The rate also uses the incident number flux: R = N_T(ρ_χ/m_χ)vσ₀A and C = N_T(ρ_χ/m_T)vσ₀. C is in s⁻¹ and R/C = A/r. Increasing individual mass at fixed mass density reduces number flux, so greater acceptance alone need not yield a greater count rate. Maximum incident kinetic-energy fractions are 4r/(1+r)² = 0.64, 1, 0.64, with equality at mass matching; these are separate from the accepted fractions. Energy units m_Tv² are joules, cross section m², density kg m⁻³ and number counts dimensionless. This conditional nuclear-recoil response does not describe field conversion, collider missing momentum or gravitational lensing. It supplies no actual detector sensitivity, empirical mass ranking, cross-section exclusion, candidate abundance or discovery. Other searches need their own population, interaction, geometry, selection and background predictions. Original Ark teaching model.
04

Other searches observe other responses

Some coherent-field searches seek conversion to an electromagnetic signal in an apparatus. Their response involves the field, coupling and instrument conditions; the nuclear-recoil threshold formula does not describe them.

Collider searches can look for momentum imbalance associated with unobserved particles. Linking such a response to the gravitating cosmological component requires further information about identity, stability, interactions and production.

Compact-object lensing searches instead use gravitational light propagation and a population distributed between sources and observer. Their event response depends on geometry, motions, source properties and selection.

These routes can complement one another when a common physical model predicts each response. Agreement has to be assessed with the distinct assumptions and backgrounds of each search intact.

05

Include backgrounds and uncertainty

An actual recoil analysis must use the relevant speed distribution, interaction response, detector efficiency and energy measurement. The simple common σ₀ and sharp threshold above were chosen inputs.

Conventional backgrounds can also produce events. A statistical comparison therefore needs predicted background shapes or rates and nuisance parameters, rather than treating every accepted event as signal.

A limit, expected sensitivity and discovery significance answer different questions. Each must be tied to a stated statistical procedure and a specific set of physical assumptions.

The table teaches why the response changes with mass and threshold within one ideal model. It does not rank real candidates or experiments, and it supplies no present-day exclusion or discovery claim.

Worked reasoning

Apply the threshold after finding the endpoint

For r = 4, derive the accepted fraction and R/C.

  1. The reduced mass is 4m_T/5, so E_max/(m_Tv²) = 2(4/5)² = 32/25.
  2. The fraction above threshold is 1−(1/4)/(32/25) = 1−25/128 = 103/128.
  3. Divide by r = 4 to include the lower number flux: R/C = 103/512.

The acceptance is about 0.804688 and the normalized accepted rate is about 0.201172.

Try the reasoning

  1. Why is the r = 1/4 row’s accepted rate zero?

    Show the answer and reasoning

    Its maximum recoil energy is 0.08m_Tv², below the supplied threshold 0.25m_Tv².

    A nonzero collision probability need not yield a recorded recoil above the threshold.

  2. Which supplied r transfers the largest possible fraction of incident kinetic energy?

    Show the answer and reasoning

    r = 1, equal incident and target masses.

    The fraction 4r/(1+r)² reaches its maximum value one there.

  3. Does a momentum-imbalance event alone determine the cosmological abundance of a new constituent?

    Show the answer and reasoning

    No.

    The event response must be connected to a physical identity, stability and production model before making that inference.

What to carry forward

  • A candidate prediction must pass through the response of the particular search.
  • Threshold acceptance and incident number flux both affect event counts.
  • Complementary observations require separate backgrounds and a common physical explanation.

References

Sources supporting the explanations, physical distinctions and examples in this lesson.

  1. 27. Dark MatterL. Baudis; S. ProfumoTeaching resource · PDFpdg.lbl.govRead source
  2. Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experimentsJ. Billard; L. Strigari; E. Figueroa-FelicianoTeaching resourcearxiv.orgRead source
  3. Axion CosmologyDavid J. E. MarshTeaching resourcearxiv.orgRead source
  4. Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent DevelopmentsBernard Carr; Florian KühnelTeaching resourcearxiv.orgRead source