GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE ARK

Learning Science · Evaluating emerging learning tools

Using a tool while practising the target skill

Choose tool support that preserves the capability the learner intends to practise.

Use the examples to connect this lesson with the earlier topics. No specialist equipment is needed.

Back to the chapter

After reading, you can

  • Separate a task’s purpose from the effort required by its parts.
  • Explain when external support helps and when it replaces target practice.
  • Assess tool-assisted and independent performance distinctly.
01

Decide what the learner should control

A calculator can remove arithmetic demands from a task about interpreting a dataset. The same calculator can replace the target activity in a lesson about mental calculation. The tool has not changed; the learning goal has.

Identify the decisions and operations the learner needs to practise. Then distinguish those from supporting demands that can reasonably be externalised. Notes, diagrams, dictionaries and software can all serve either role depending on the task.

02

Use support to make reasoning possible

A learner examining a scientific argument may use a glossary for unfamiliar terms. That support can free attention for evaluating the argument. The learner still needs to identify the claim, inspect evidence and explain the connection.

If a tool produces the complete argument, the learner may finish the assignment without practising those decisions. Completion remains an observable product, but its relationship to the intended learning has changed.

03

Design an interaction with a learner contribution

Ask for a prediction before showing a model, a reason for choosing a method or a comparison of two proposed explanations. A hint can point to a relevant relationship while leaving the learner a meaningful step.

There is no universal requirement to remove all assistance. Some capabilities properly include choosing and using tools. State whether the goal is independent recall, supported explanation or competent tool-assisted work, and assess that arrangement honestly.

The same support can play different roles depending on the target.
SupportTarget retainedTarget replaced
CalculatorInterpreting a verified numerical patternPractising the arithmetic operation
Generated outlineCritiquing an outline with reasonsPlanning an argument from scratch
Automatic graphInterpreting plotted relationshipsChoosing and constructing the scale
04

Use a changed task to inspect dependence

After support, change the example or reduce a nonessential cue and observe the response. Can the learner explain what the tool did, detect a plausible error and decide when help is needed? Those questions reveal more than whether the output looks polished.

Keep essential access support available. Removing a screen reader, necessary communication aid or safety support would change access rather than simply test understanding. The target capability determines which assistance can reasonably vary.

Worked example

A spreadsheet in two lessons

How can the same spreadsheet support trend interpretation but bypass graph-scale practice?

  1. In a lesson about interpreting trends, a spreadsheet can draw a graph from verified data while the learner chooses appropriate variables and explains the pattern. In a lesson about constructing a graph scale, automatically accepting the default axes can bypass the target decision.
  2. The teacher asks the second learner to choose and justify the scale, then compare it with the default. The tool becomes a comparison partner while the learner retains the decision being taught.

Automatic plotting can leave the interpretation with the learner. If choosing the scale is the goal, the learner must choose and justify it, then inspect the default as a comparison rather than silently accept it.

Try it yourself

Think through each question before opening the answer.

  1. Should every learning check prohibit tools?

    Show the answer and reasoning

    No. Some goals concern tool-assisted competence or require access support. Specify the target and permitted support.

    The support condition is part of the capability being assessed. Tools and necessary access aids may properly belong to a goal; prohibition is not a universal test of understanding.

  2. What does a polished generated essay directly demonstrate about its user?

    Show the answer and reasoning

    The product exists under that arrangement. Independent planning, reasoning or writing requires evidence of the learner’s own contribution.

    The final product does not identify who made the planning or reasoning decisions. Evidence of the user’s own choices, explanations or fresh performance is needed for those separate claims.

What to carry forward

  • Tools should serve an explicit learning goal.
  • Keep meaningful target decisions with the learner.
  • Describe tool-assisted and independent outcomes separately.

References

Sources supporting the explanations and learning checks in this lesson.

  1. How People Learn II: Digital Technology (2018)National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicineConsensus report chapternationalacademies.orgRead source
  2. Guidance for generative AI in education and research (2023)Fengchun Miao; Wayne HolmesInstitutional publication overviewunesco.orgRead source
  3. CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines 3.0 (2024)CASTDesign frameworkudlguidelines.cast.orgRead source