Materials Science · Units, loads, stress and strain
Deformation and relative strain
Calculate relative length change, compare different gauge lengths, and interpret what a specimen or machine measurement actually tells you about deformation and recovery.
Useful background: Materials, questions and levels of evidence. Each worked case explains the quantities it uses.
Back to the chapterAfter reading, you can
- Calculate signed engineering strain from original and current gauge lengths, expressing it as a ratio or percentage.
- Compare extensions fairly by accounting for original gauge length.
- Distinguish average gauge strain from local deformation and machine displacement.
- Interpret loaded and residual strain without assuming that an immediate residual is permanent.
The same extension can mean different deformation
A 1 mm extension is substantial for a 10 mm gauge length and smaller relative to a 100 mm gauge length. Engineering strain compares the length change with the original measured length: ε = ΔL/L₀. The gauge length is the interval over which extension is measured.
Choose two marks on the specimen and call their original separation L₀. When their separation becomes L, their extension is ΔL = L − L₀. The Greek letter ε, epsilon, denotes the relative change. A strain of 0.01 means the length changed by one hundredth of its original value.
Displacement describes movement of a point; deformation concerns a change of shape or size. If both gauge marks move 3 mm in the same direction and their separation stays 50 mm, the specimen has translated but that gauge has no axial extension. Tracking only one end would not establish strain.
A ratio with no length unit
Divide lengths expressed in matching units. The units cancel, so strain is dimensionless. Multiplying the ratio by 100 expresses percent strain. Thus ε = 0.002 is the same relative change as 0.2 %, not 0.002 %. The written form mm/mm can remind us what was divided; it does not give strain the dimension of length.
We use positive strain for an increase in gauge length and negative strain for a decrease. If a 40 mm gauge shortens to 39.8 mm, ΔL = −0.2 mm and ε = −0.2/40 = −0.005, or −0.5 %. Some reports give only a positive compression magnitude; check the sign convention before comparing results.
Keep the original length in the denominator when calculating engineering strain. Dividing by the final length answers a different question. Other strain measures are useful for large changes and are introduced later; the present formula is explicitly a relative change referred to L₀.
The gauge is a measurement interval
If extension is distributed uniformly, a gauge twice as long contains twice the extension, so ΔL/L₀ stays the same. Equal extension on different gauge lengths is a different comparison: 1 mm over 10 mm is 10 %, whereas 1 mm over 100 mm is 1 %.
A gauge can also contain regions that deform differently. Its overall strain then describes the average relative length change over that interval. It does not reveal the largest local strain. For adjoining collinear gauge segments, add their extensions and original lengths before taking the overall ratio; a plain average of the two strain numbers works only when their original lengths are equal.
An extensometer measures the change between defined specimen points. The testing machine’s moving crosshead can also move because grips settle, the load train deforms or material outside the selected gauge stretches. Its displacement is therefore not automatically the extension of that gauge. The measurement interval must match the quantity being calculated.
A strain value needs a loading state and a time
A length measurement while loaded can include recoverable and permanent deformation. Removing the load may allow immediate recovery, delayed recovery, or both. A residual strain is the relative change still present at a stated time after unloading; that word describes an observation, not its final cause.
For example, internal rearrangements in a time-dependent material can allow recovery to continue after the external load is removed. A residual measured immediately after unloading need not be permanent. Conversely, a specimen that eventually returns to L₀ still had nonzero strain while it was loaded.
Record the gauge definition, loading state, elapsed recovery time and relevant conditions such as temperature. This lesson calculates relative length changes; deciding which microscopic mechanism caused them needs further evidence. Elastic response, plasticity and time-dependent behaviour are developed in their own lessons.
Worked examples
From two lengths to one strain
A gauge length increases from 50.00 mm to 50.10 mm. Find engineering strain and check the percent conversion.
- Extension is ΔL = 50.10 − 50.00 = 0.10 mm. The final length is not itself the extension.
- Divide by the original interval: ε = 0.10 mm/50.00 mm = 0.002. The length units cancel.
- Express the same value as a percentage: 0.002 × 100 = 0.2 %. A 0.2 % change of 50 mm is 0.002 × 50 = 0.10 mm, which checks the result.
- The gauge length is 1.002 times its original value. The sketch exaggerates the small extension so the two end positions can be distinguished.
Engineering strain is 0.002, or 0.2 %. The measured extension is 0.10 mm.
Match the comparison to its denominator
Two specimens each extend by 0.20 mm. Their original gauge lengths are 20 mm and 80 mm. Compare their strains. What extension would an 80 mm gauge have if it instead experienced the first specimen’s uniform strain?
- For the short gauge, ε₁ = 0.20/20 = 0.010 = 1 %.
- For the long gauge, ε₂ = 0.20/80 = 0.0025 = 0.25 %. The same extension is four times the relative change in the shorter interval.
- Under the separate hypothesis of uniform strain ε = 0.010 in an 80 mm gauge, rearrange the definition: ΔL = εL₀ = 0.010 × 80 mm = 0.80 mm.
- Equal extension and equal strain are different conditions. A longer specimen may move farther while having the same relative deformation; neither comparison alone establishes material strength.
The actual strains are 1 % and 0.25 %. At a uniform strain of 1 %, an 80 mm gauge would extend 0.80 mm.
An average can hide a more strained region
A 50 mm gauge comprises adjoining 10 mm and 40 mm segments. Their axial extensions are 0.04 mm and 0.06 mm. Find each segment’s strain and the overall gauge strain.
- The short segment has ε₁ = 0.04/10 = 0.004 = 0.4 %. The longer segment has ε₂ = 0.06/40 = 0.0015 = 0.15 %.
- The full original length is 10 + 40 = 50 mm, and its extension is 0.04 + 0.06 = 0.10 mm. Thus the overall strain is 0.10/50 = 0.002 = 0.2 %.
- An arithmetic average, (0.4 % + 0.15 %)/2 = 0.275 %, would give equal weight to unequal lengths. The correct weighting is (10/50) × 0.4 % + (40/50) × 0.15 % = 0.2 %.
- The whole-gauge result is smaller than the 0.4 % strain of the short segment. It cannot be used as the maximum local value. The given extensions are an illustrative measurement case, not a uniform-material law.
The segment strains are 0.4 % and 0.15 %; the overall gauge strain is 0.2 %.
Try the reasoning
A 2 mm extension is reported for one specimen. A second specimen has a 200 mm gauge and 0.5 % strain. What missing information prevents a fair strain comparison, and what is the second specimen’s extension?
Show the answer and reasoning
The first specimen’s original gauge length is missing. The second extends 1 mm.
The first strain would be 2 mm/L₀, so extension alone does not rank the relative changes. For the second, 0.5 % = 0.005 and ΔL = 0.005 × 200 mm = 1 mm.
At constant temperature, an illustrative 100 mm gauge is 101 mm while loaded, 100.4 mm immediately after unloading and 100.1 mm after ten minutes. Calculate the three strains. What can and cannot be concluded about permanent deformation?
Show the answer and reasoning
Loaded strain is 1 %; immediate residual strain is 0.4 %; the ten-minute residual is 0.1 %. Some recovery continued after unloading, but the final permanent strain is undetermined.
Subtract the same original 100 mm and divide each extension by 100 mm. The decline from 0.4 % to 0.1 % demonstrates delayed recovery in these stipulated readings. A later value or suitable recovery evidence is needed before calling the remaining value permanent; zero strain later would not erase the earlier loaded strain.
A 25.0 mm gauge shortens by 0.10 mm. A learner calculates 0.10/24.90 = +0.004016. Correct the engineering-strain calculation and identify both errors.
Show the answer and reasoning
ε = −0.10/25.0 = −0.004 = −0.4 %.
The change is negative under the stated tension-positive convention, and engineering strain uses the original 25.0 mm denominator. Dividing by the final length gives a different ratio. A positive compression magnitude could be quoted only with that alternative convention stated.
During one test, the machine crosshead moves 0.30 mm while a 50 mm specimen gauge extends 0.10 mm. Compare the gauge strain with the value obtained by dividing crosshead travel by 50 mm. What does the discrepancy tell you?
Show the answer and reasoning
The gauge strain is 0.2 %. The crosshead-based calculation gives 0.6 %, three times as large.
The matched measurement is 0.10/50 = 0.002. The other quotient, 0.30/50 = 0.006, assigns motion from a different measurement interval to this gauge. The difference may include machine, grip or out-of-gauge deformation; these two numbers do not isolate which contribution caused it.
What to carry forward
- Extension is a length change; engineering strain divides it by the original gauge length.
- Use matching length units, the stated sign convention and the correct percent conversion.
- A gauge average need not equal a local maximum, and machine motion need not equal gauge extension.
- Name the loading state and recovery time before interpreting a residual strain.
References
Teaching resources and research supporting this lesson’s explanations and examples.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology2 sources
- Extensometers — gauge length and specimen strainInstronInstrument manufacturer guide
- The International System of Units (SI)BIPMSI Brochure, 9th edition, updated 2026