Chemistry · Lesson
Magnetic resonance and molecular information
Read a magnetic-resonance signal with its nucleus, field and reference specified. Distinguish resonance frequency, relative chemical shift, first-order coupling patterns and quantitative integration conditions.
Back to the Chemistry mapBy the end, you can
- Keep angular magnetogyric ratio and ordinary resonance frequency distinct.
- Convert a referenced chemical shift between ppm and a frequency offset.
- Apply an explicitly weak-coupling spin-1/2 pattern and recognize integration limits.
A magnetic field splits the states of a suitable nucleus
Nuclear magnetic resonance is isotope-specific. A nucleus with spin quantum number I has 2I+1 magnetic substates; an I=0 nucleus does not supply an ordinary nuclear-spin resonance. For an uncoupled spin-1/2 nucleus, a static field produces two levels and an appropriately tuned radiofrequency magnetic field can induce transitions. Nuclear spin is a quantum property, not a literal small spinning charged ball.
For a positive angular magnetogyric ratio γ in an unshielded model, the gap is ħγB₀ and ordinary frequency is ν = γB₀/(2π). In an isotropic chemical environment, an averaged dimensionless shielding σ modifies the simple expression to ν = γ(1−σ)B₀/(2π). Field, isotope, reference, solvent, temperature and interactions matter for interpreting an actual sample.
A chemical shift is a referenced frequency ratio
Define δ = (ν_sample − ν_ref)/ν_ref, with matched frequencies for the same nucleus and reference convention. The dimensionless fraction multiplied by 10⁶ gives the numerical shift in ppm. A positive δ means the sample frequency is higher than the reference frequency in this convention. Chemical shift is not the same quantity as absolute shielding.
An illustrative offset of 1200 Hz from a 400 MHz reference gives δ = 3.00 ppm. Under comparable isotropic chemical conditions and the same referencing convention, that relative shift gives an 1800 Hz offset at a 600 MHz reference. Use actual reference frequencies when precision matters; a nominal instrument label is not automatically the exact ν_ref.
A simple multiplet requires a simple coupling model
In a weak first-order model, coupling an observed spin-1/2 nucleus to n equivalent spin-1/2 neighbours with equal coupling J gives n+1 components with binomial relative areas. The relevant frequency separation must be much larger than J, and unresolved other couplings, exchange or inequivalent neighbours can change the pattern. Chemical equivalence alone is not always magnetic equivalence. The simple binomial areas also assume approximately equal populations of the neighbour spin configurations.
For a specified three-neighbour model with J=7.00 Hz, a quartet has relative component areas 1:3:3:1 at offsets −3J/2, −J/2, +J/2 and +3J/2 from its centre. These are ideal component areas, not universal peak heights; line widths and acquisition can affect what is displayed.
| Offset from centre / Hz | Neighbour configurations | Relative component area | Normalized area |
|---|---|---|---|
| −10.5 | 1 | 1 | 1/8 |
| −3.50 | 3 | 3 | 3/8 |
| +3.50 | 3 | 3 | 3/8 |
| +10.5 | 1 | 1 | 1/8 |
Original weak-coupling model for an observed spin-1/2 nucleus with three equivalent spin-1/2 neighbours and equal J=7.00 Hz. Frequency separation is much larger than J, with no additional unresolved coupling or exchange. Neighbour spin configurations are assumed equally populated. Areas are ideal component probabilities; widths and measured peak heights are not supplied.
A small population excess is not a tiny lower-level population
For an ideal free-proton model at stipulated B₀=9.40 T, the current free-proton γ/(2π) gives approximately 400.228 MHz before rounding the field input. At 300 K, nearly half the nuclei occupy each level; the lower-state excess over the upper state is only about 3.20 × 10⁻⁵ of the total. This is not the exact chemically shielded resonance of a proton in a molecule.
Resolved proton integrations can give represented-number ratios under suitable relaxation, acquisition, baseline and separation conditions. Absolute counts also need a scale or other information. Routine decoupled carbon-13 areas are not automatically proportional to carbon counts. NMR patterns can constrain structures without proving a unique structure alone. EPR or ESR instead probes electronic magnetic moments, commonly through microwave transitions of systems with unpaired electrons.
Worked examples
Convert one referenced ratio at two frequencies
Use a stipulated 1200 Hz sample-minus-reference offset with ν_ref=400 MHz. Find δ in ppm and the offset for the same δ at a 600 MHz reference under matched chemical conditions.
- Convert 400 MHz to 400 × 10⁶ Hz.
- δ = 1200/(400 × 10⁶) = 3.00 × 10⁻⁶.
- Multiplying by 10⁶ gives 3.00 ppm.
- At 600 MHz, Δν = 3.00 × 10⁻⁶ × 600 × 10⁶ Hz = 1800 Hz.
δ = 3.00 ppm; the corresponding second offset is 1.80 × 10³ Hz. The relative ratio stays the same while the Hz offset changes.
Enumerate the stated first-order pattern
Three equivalent spin-1/2 neighbours couple with equal J=7.00 Hz under weak first-order conditions. Find the component count, offsets and relative areas.
- There are 2³=8 neighbour spin configurations.
- They group into multiplicities 1,3,3,1 for four net-spin sums.
- The offsets are −3J/2, −J/2, +J/2 and +3J/2.
- Normalize the component areas by the total 8.
Four components at −10.5, −3.50, +3.50 and +10.5 Hz, with relative areas 1:3:3:1. This counting is conditional on the specified coupling model.
Try it yourself
At a 600 MHz reference, what offset corresponds to +2.00 ppm under the stated relative-frequency convention?
Show the answer and reasoning
+1.20 × 10³ Hz.
Multiply the reference frequency by the dimensionless shift 2.00 × 10⁻⁶.
How many first-order components follow from one equivalent spin-1/2 neighbour with the stated ordinary coupling assumptions?
Show the answer and reasoning
Two.
The n+1 rule gives a doublet in this restricted model.
Does a small thermal lower-minus-upper excess imply only a small fraction occupies the lower state?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
Almost half can occupy each level while their difference is small.
Are routine decoupled carbon-13 signal areas automatically quantitative carbon counts?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
Relaxation and acquisition effects require appropriate quantitative conditions.
What to carry forward
- Specify isotope, field and reference.
- Keep ordinary frequency distinct from angular γ.
- Use n+1 only with its weak-coupling equivalence assumptions.
- Population excess, component areas and quantitative atom counts are different quantities.
References
Teaching resources and reference material supporting this lesson’s explanations and examples.
- NMR nomenclature: Nuclear spin properties and conventions for chemical shiftsRobin K. Harris; Edwin D. Becker; Sonia M. Cabral de Menezes; Robin Goodfellow; Pierre GrangerSource · PDF
- Chemical Shift ReferencingHongjun ZhouSource
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyWilliam ReuschSource
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)2 sources