Chemistry · Lesson
States, operators and the quantum description of molecules
Read a wavefunction as a probability amplitude, with a stated model and normalization. Distinguish allowed measurement outcomes from their average and a molecular state from a one-electron orbital.
Back to the Chemistry mapBy the end, you can
- Normalize complex coefficients in an orthonormal basis.
- Distinguish position density, finite-region probability and expectation.
- Interpret stationary states and molecular many-particle descriptions without assigning classical electron orbits.
An amplitude supplies probabilities through its modulus squared
For a normalized pure one-particle state, a position wavefunction ψ is a complex amplitude. In one dimension, |ψ(x)|² is a probability density and the probability of a region is its integral over that region. If x is in metres, ψ has units m^(−1/2) and the density has units m⁻¹. A density value is not itself the probability of one exact coordinate.
For a molecule, the full many-electron wavefunction depends on all electron coordinates and spin variables, with nuclear variables included or treated under specified approximations. A one-electron orbital is a component of an electronic-structure description. Its modulus squared is not generally the entire molecule’s many-electron probability distribution or total electron density.
Complex coefficients are amplitudes rather than probabilities
For orthonormal discrete basis states, a normalized expansion has Σ|cⱼ|² = 1. If a finite nonzero state norm is not one, divide the state by its norm. With raw coefficients 1 and 2i, the squared norm is 1 + 4 = 5, so normalized coefficients are 1/√5 and 2i/√5.
Multiplying the entire normalized state by a common constant phase changes no measurement predictions. Relative phases between components can matter for other observables, even when a particular energy measurement has the same probabilities. Nonorthogonal basis functions require an overlap matrix rather than a simple sum of coefficient squares.
An expectation need not be one allowed result
An observable is represented by an operator with the appropriate self-adjoint domain; a finite-dimensional example uses a Hermitian matrix. In an orthonormal basis of its nondegenerate eigenstates, the probability of eigenvalue aⱼ is |cⱼ|² and the expectation is Σ|cⱼ|²aⱼ. For a degenerate eigenvalue, sum the probability in its eigenspace. Continuous spectra require integrals.
In an invented two-state energy model with eigenvalues 1 eV and 4 eV, the normalized coefficients above give probabilities 1/5 and 4/5. The average is 3.4 eV. A single ideal energy measurement returns 1 or 4 eV, not their average. Repeated identically prepared systems provide the statistical meaning of that expectation.
| Energy component | Normalized coefficient | Probability | Contribution to ⟨E⟩ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue 1 eV | 1/√5 | 1/5 = 0.200 | 0.200 eV |
| Eigenvalue 4 eV | 2i/√5 | 4/5 = 0.800 | 3.20 eV |
| Complete normalized state | Squared norm = 1 | Probability sum = 1 | ⟨E⟩ = 3.4 eV |
Original two-state pure-state model with nondegenerate energies 1 eV and 4 eV and orthonormal eigenstates. The coefficient i is a relative complex phase. The total expectation 3.4 eV is a statistical mean, rather than a third possible ideal energy outcome.
A stationary state differs from a general superposition
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is iħ∂Ψ/∂t = ĤΨ, with ħ = h/(2π) and h the Planck constant. For a time-independent Hamiltonian, an energy eigenstate evolves with a phase exp(−iEt/ħ). Its position probability density is stationary even though the state vector has a time-dependent phase.
A superposition of different energies acquires changing relative phases, so some measurement distributions can vary with time. This model evolution does not give a classical electron trajectory. Interactions with other systems or a changing Hamiltonian require their own description rather than a universal picture of electrons moving on fixed planetary paths.
Worked examples
Normalize amplitudes before averaging energies
For two orthonormal energy states at 1 and 4 eV, the raw coefficients are 1 and 2i. Find their probabilities and the mean energy.
- The squared norm is |1|² + |2i|² = 5.
- Divide each coefficient by √5.
- Their squared moduli are 1/5 and 4/5.
- Average the energy: (1/5) × 1 + (4/5) × 4 = 3.4 eV.
The probabilities are 20% and 80%, and ⟨E⟩ = 3.4 eV. The possible single energy outcomes remain 1 and 4 eV.
Try it yourself
In an orthonormal basis, a normalized coefficient has magnitude 1/2. What probability does it assign to that nondegenerate outcome?
Show the answer and reasoning
1/4.
Probability is the squared modulus, not the amplitude magnitude.
Does a one-dimensional density of 2 × 10⁹ m⁻¹ represent a probability greater than 1?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
A finite-region probability integrates the dimensional density.
For the supplied two-state model, is 3.4 eV an allowed single ideal energy outcome?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
It is the expectation of outcomes at 1 and 4 eV.
Is a single orbital generally the full interacting many-electron molecular wavefunction?
Show the answer and reasoning
No.
It is a one-electron function used within an explicitly chosen description.
What to carry forward
- Normalize amplitudes on the correct basis.
- Integrate a density to obtain a region probability.
- Keep measurement outcomes distinct from their expectation.
- A molecular state and a single orbital describe different objects.
References
Teaching resources and reference material supporting this lesson’s explanations and examples.
University of Cambridge2 sources
Massachusetts Institute of Technology2 sources
- 5.61 Lecture 19: Spectroscopy: Probing Molecules with LightTroy Van Voorhis (original Fall 2013 notes, explicit PDF footnote); Robert W. Field (2017 course instructor)Source · PDF
- 5.61 Lecture 29: Modern Electronic Structure Theory: Electron CorrelationTroy Van Voorhis (notes credited by course index)Source · PDF